home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: inforamp.net!ts43-11
- From: crs0794@inforamp.net (Geoffrey Welsh)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: are USR Couriers really a superior modem?
- Date: 16 Mar 1996 23:18:33 GMT
- Organization: InfoRamp Inc., Toronto, Ontario (416) 363-9100
- Message-ID: <4ifi89$93v@sam.inforamp.net>
- References: <4hq3uu$moe@gryphon.phoenix.net> <4hqi4d$17a@brickbat.mindspring.com> <4i7e8j$2cle@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4i7ihj$aim@B1FF.mindspring.com><4hq3uu$moe@gryphon.phoenix.net> <4hqi4d$17a@brickbat.mindspring.com> <4i7e8j$2cle@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4i7ihj$aim@B1FF.mindspring.com> <4ia9p9$2b2e@usenetw1.news.prodigy.com> <4ibpsc$j7e@B1FF.mindspring.com> <blevinDoBLr3.E57@netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ts43-11.tor.inforamp.net
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
-
- In article <blevinDoBLr3.E57@netcom.com>,
- blevin@netcom.com (Bryan Levin) wrote:
- >There's no difference between downloading the adobe acrocrap and ghostscript
- -
- >both are free and both allow you to view on your screen (or print) rich text
- >documents.
-
- I once made the mistake of using Ghostscript to do preliminary work on some
- forms for a Postscript printer (specifically, a $200,000 Xerox 92 PPM
- DocuPrint) and discovered to my horror that Ghostscript page positioning
- didn't agree with 'real' Postscript! The result was that the form had to be
- completely re-done...
-
- --
- Geoffrey Welsh, Developer, InSystems Technologies Inc.
- Temporary: crs0794@inforamp.net; At work: insystem@pathcom.com
- At home: geoff@zswamp.uucp or [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff
- Capitalism is a cold-hearted system which guards the interests of whoever's
- at the top, yet hypocritically claims that it offers everyone a fair shot.
- So is every other system ever put in place by man.
-